Sucker Punch explained. SPOILERS, so be careful. in fact, i'd prefer that you
watch the movie before you read this.
i'll be honest: when i first saw
Sucker Punch i wasn't too impressed. the acting was so-so, the effects were distracting, and the story really is complicated and difficult to follow.
i was prepared to think there was a deep and profound message hidden in the story, then told myself it was just that "women are strong" and was disappointed. at least i wasn't too deeply and profoundly disappointed, for which i am thankful; i remained entertained and asking things until the end of the film.
but then my sister found this article, and told me about it. i was blown away. these messages were lost on me as i saw the film, but when i thought about it, and then saw the film again, it all fell into place.
but the thing is, that's not how it's supposed to happen. the audience is not supposed to work too hard to arrive at what's going on - discussion shouldn't blur sentiments, people shouldn't arrive at the proper context by stumbling onto obscure writeups on the web.
plus, the audience is not supposed to be driven off by bad acting and confusing, overtly offensive presentation at first viewing. it's just not DONE.
however, it's a very interesting technique. i keep thinking of ways to improve on this highly stylized presentation, and i can't arrive at one - except perhaps for better casting. this is as personal as it gets for an independent storyteller - this is all the pretense and homage and genius that have been boiling inside for years.
it's still a story that deserves to have been told, in the way it was told. it's earned my respect and has made my recs list for being unique. but i hesitate from saying it's one of my favorites, because i'm still trying to decide if the things that made it so WEIRD in fact gave it an advantage or a handicap. a year after seeing the film, my mind is still doing a whole lot of weighing.